The Roots Analysis team is putting in its best effort to offer our clients / readers a reliable source of information, regarding how the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors are coping in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our intention is to generate realistic insights, based on a variety of factors, which are anticipated to influence both prevalent and future market dynamics. Reach out to us for any help.

Global Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market, 2020-2030

  • Lowest Price Guaranteed From USD 4,899

  • Published
    May 2020

  • Pages
    254

  • View Count
    4905

Example Insights

Global-Handheld-Ultrasound-Imaging-Devices-Market-Context Global-Handheld-Ultrasound-Imaging-Devices-Market-List-of-developer Global-Handheld-Ultrasound-Imaging-Devices-Market-Different-transducer-arrays
Global-Handheld-Ultrasound-Imaging-Devices-Market-Geographical-Distribution Global-Handheld-Ultrasound-Imaging-Devices-Market-Brand-Positioning-MatriX Global-Handheld-Ultrasound-Imaging-Devices-Market-Brand-Partnerships-and-Collaborations
Global-Handheld-Ultrasound-Imaging-Devices-Market-Cost-Saving-Analysis Global-Handheld-Ultrasound-Imaging-Devices-Market-Market-opportunities Global-Handheld-Ultrasound-Imaging-Devices-Market-key-geographical-regions

 

Overview

I believe that adoption of handheld ultrasound imaging devices can lead to about 10% enhancement in physicians’ / radiologists’ efficiency, thereby allowing them to perform more scans in a single day

-- CEO, a Germany-based small-sized company

Since the discovery of ultrasound, the field of medical imaging has evolved significantly, offering non-invasive means for physicians to accurately visualize almost all major organ systems for diagnostic purposes. However, conventional medical imaging solutions are severely limited in terms of mobility, throughput and are usually dependent on stationary power sources. As a result, they are impractical in situations characterized by low physician / pathologist to patient ratios. There is, therefore, an urgent need for solutions that can increase diagnosis efficiency in order to relieve the overly-burdened global healthcare system. Handheld ultrasound imaging devices are lightweight, mobile or portable devices / scanners, which are designed for diagnostic purposes. The applications of such devices in modern healthcare are vast, spanning almost all major medical disciplines, such as abdomen, cardiology, gynecology, musculoskeletal, obstetrical, orthopedics, pediatrics and urology. In this context, it is worth mentioning that multiple studies have recently described the use of handheld ultrasound scanners in diagnosing individuals suspected of having contracted the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Considering the lack / scarcity of confirmatory tests, these devices have proven useful in quarantining those who displayed pleural wall thickening and lung congestion, a characteristic of pneumonia.

Presently, a number of handheld ultrasound imaging devices, and several device developers are engaged in efforts to further improve their products, incorporating features, such as customized software and mobile applications (designed to display / analyze scanned images), advanced safety provisions, remote patient monitoring and other smart functions. However, a significant proportion of medical professionals have limited, or no, access to these handheld ultrasonography scanners. This, coupled to the fact that nearly 40% of ultrasound scanners in resource-deprived countries are reportedly not fully functional, is an impediment to healthcare. It is also important to note that the cost of handheld / portable scanners is significantly lower than their counterparts. For instance, Butterfly iQ is a handheld ultrasound scanner that is available at merely 2% of the cost of a traditional ultrasound machine (USD 100,000). In future, such devices are anticipated to become more popular and eventually replace bulky, traditional medical imaging machines. In fact, the increasing interest in point-of-care diagnostics is anticipated to create lucrative opportunities for stakeholders engaged in this field.

Scope of the Report

The “Global Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market, 2020-2030” report features an extensive study of the current market landscape, offering an informed opinion on the likely adoption of such compact diagnostic devices, over the next decade. The report features an in-depth analysis, highlighting the capabilities of various stakeholders engaged in this domain. In addition to other elements, the study includes:

  • An overview of the current market landscape of the handheld ultrasound imaging devices, providing information on the status of development, application area (abdomen, cardiac, gynecological, pulmonary, urological scanning and others), weight of device, type of transducer array (convex / curved, linear, micro-convex, transvaginal, phased and others), transducer frequency, mode of imaging (brightness, color doppler, motion, power doppler, pulsed wave, tissue harmonic and others), field of view, scanning depth, type of software (smartphone application and customized software application), connectivity provision (universal serial bus (USB), cellular / WiFi and bluetooth), data management feature(s) (internal, external, and cloud / remote monitoring), battery backup and cost of device. In addition, it presents details of the device developers, highlighting year of establishment, company size, type of business model used (B2B and B2C), target market (domestic and domestic and international) and location of headquarters. Further, it highlights the key initiatives taken by the various device developers to tackle the on-going global pandemic of COVID-19.
  • An in-depth analysis of the contemporary market trends, presented using four schematic representations, including [A] a bubble analysis comparing the leading players engaged in the development of handheld ultrasound imaging devices, based on the parameters, such as application area, mode of imaging, number of devices and company size, [B] a grid representation illustrating the distribution of scanners based on application area, type of transducer array and type of software, [C] an insightful heat map representation, highlighting the distribution of devices on the basis of application area and mode of imaging, and [D] a tree map representation of the handheld ultrasound imaging devices, distributed on the basis of mode of imaging and connectivity provision. 
  • Elaborate profiles of mid-sized / large companies that are engaged in the development of handheld ultrasound imaging scanners. Each company profile features a brief overview of the company (with information on year of establishment, number of employees, location of headquarters and key members of the executive team), details of their respective product portfolio, recent developments and an informed future outlook
  • A detailed brand positioning analysis of key industry players, highlighting the current perceptions regarding their proprietary brands by taking into consideration several relevant aspects, such as strength of product portfolio, type of software, mode of imaging, connectivity provisions,  geographical presence / reach and supplier power of each company.
  • An analysis of the partnerships that have been inked by stakeholders in the domain, during the time period 2010-2020 (till April), covering licensing agreements, acquisitions and mergers, research and development agreements, product distribution agreements and other relevant types of deals 
  • An insightful analysis highlighting cost saving potential associated with the use of handheld ultrasound imaging devices, based on information from close to 50 countries, taking into consideration various parameters, such as total number of radiologists, annual salary, number of ultrasound scans performed and increase in efficiency by adoption of these handheld ultrasound imaging devices.
  • An informed estimate of the global demand for handheld ultrasound imaging devices for the period 2020-2030, taking into account the impact of COVID-19, historical sales of these devices, and annual revenues (generated by sales of these devices) of prominent device manufacturers
  • A review of the product distribution strategies adopted by different end-users, demand and market attractiveness for handheld ultrasound imaging devices across different types of end-users, including ambulatory surgical centers, diagnostic imaging centers, hospitals, maternity clinics, specialty clinics and others.
  • An insightful discussion on the impact of COVID-19 on the overall handheld ultrasound imaging devices market, along with the key lessons learnt from big pharma players in 2008 recession.
  • An informative analysis of contemporary Google Trends in the time period between 2015 and 2020 (till July) and insights from the recent news articles related to handheld ultrasound imaging devices, indicating the increasing popularity of this domain.

    
One of the key objectives of the report was to estimate the existing market size and the future opportunity for handheld ultrasound imaging device manufacturer over the next decade. Based on the demand, likely adoption, and expected price variations for these devices, we have provided an informed estimate of the evolution of the market for the period 2020-2030. The report also features the likely distribution of the current and forecasted opportunity within handheld ultrasound imaging devices market across [A] application area (cardiac, emergency medicines, gynecological / obstetrics, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, urological, vascular and other application areas), [B] type of transducer array (curved, endocavity, linear, phased and other scanners), [C] type of software (smartphone application and customized software-based scanners), [D] end-users (ambulatory surgical centers, diagnostic imaging centers, hospitals, maternity clinics, specialty clinics and other end-users), and [E] key geographical regions (North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific and rest of the world). In order to account for future uncertainties and to add robustness to our model, we have provided three forecast scenarios, namely conservative, base and optimistic scenarios, representing different tracks of the industry’s growth.

The opinions and insights presented in the report were influenced by discussions held with senior stakeholders in the industry. The report features detailed transcripts of interviews held with the following industry stakeholders:

  • Stefan Maas (Chief Executive Officer, SomaView)
  • Colin Finlayson (Chief Operating Officer, Ballater Medical)
  • Anais Concepcion (Director of Content and Digital Campaigns, EchoNous)
  • Zhengzheng Zhu (International Business Development, PeakSonic)

All actual figures have been sourced and analyzed from publicly available information forums and primary research discussions. Financial figures mentioned in this report are in USD, unless otherwise specified.
 

Contents

Chapter Outlines

Chapter 2 is an executive summary of the key insights captured in our research. It offers a high-level view on the current state of handheld ultrasound imaging market and its likely evolution in the short-mid term and long term. 

Chapter 3 is a general introduction to the concept of ultrasound imaging, its historical evolution and the challenges associated with the conventional ultrasound imaging devices. Further, the chapter provides an overview of the portable ultrasound imaging devices and their types (movable and handheld). It also emphasizes on key application areas wherein these handheld ultrasound imaging devices are being frequently used. The chapter also includes a discussion on the regulatory guidelines related to the use of handheld ultrasound imaging devices across various geographies. Further, the chapter highlights the key advantages and roadblocks associated with the use of handheld ultrasound imaging devices. Additionally, it includes an analysis of contemporary trends, as observed on the Google Trends (till April 2020) and insights from the recent news articles related to handheld ultrasound imaging devices, indicating the increasing popularity of this domain.

Chapter 4 includes a detailed analysis of the current market landscape of over 90 handheld ultrasound imaging devices, based on the status of development, application area (abdomen, cardiac, gynecological, pulmonary, urological scanning and others) weight of device, type of transducer array (convex / curved, linear, micro-convex, transvaginal, phased and others), transducer frequency, mode of imaging (brightness, color doppler, motion, power doppler, pulsed wave, tissue harmonic and others), field of view, scanning depth, type of software (smartphone application and customized software application), connectivity provision (UBS, cellular / WiFi and bluetooth), data management feature(s) (internal / external, and cloud / remote monitoring), battery backup and cost of device. Further, the chapter provides an analysis of the device manufacturer(s) based on their year of establishment, company size, type of business model used (B2B and B2C), target market (domestic and domestic and international) and location of headquarters. It also highlights the contemporary market trends in four schematic representations, which include [A] a bubble analysis comparing the leading players engaged in the development of handheld ultrasound imaging devices, based on the parameters, such as application area, mode of imaging, number of devices and company size, [B] a grid representation illustrating the distribution of scanners based on application area, type of transducer array and type of software, [C] an insightful heat map representation, highlighting the distribution of devices on the basis of application area and mode of imaging, and [D] a tree map representation of the handheld ultrasound imaging devices, distributed on the basis of mode of imaging and connectivity provision. In addition, it includes information on the affiliated technology platforms to improve the device features. Further, the chapter highlights the key initiatives taken by the various device developers to tackle the on-going global pandemic of COVID-19.

Chapter 5 features elaborate profiles of mid-sized / large companies that are engaged in the development of at least two handheld ultrasound imaging scanners. Each company profile features a brief overview of the company (with information on year of establishment, number of employees, location of headquarters and key members of the executive team), details of their respective product portfolio, recent developments and an informed future outlook.

Chapter 6 presents a detailed brand positioning analysis of key industry players, highlighting the current perceptions regarding their proprietary brands by taking into consideration several relevant aspects, such as strength of product portfolio, type of software, mode of imaging, connectivity provisions,  geographical presence / reach and supplier power of each company.

Chapter 7 features an in-depth analysis and discussion on the various partnerships inked between the players in this market in the time period between 2010 and 2020 (till April), covering licensing agreements, acquisitions and mergers, research and development agreements, product distribution agreements and other relevant types of deals.

Chapter 8 provides an insightful analysis highlighting cost saving potential associated with the use of handheld ultrasound imaging devices. The insights presented in this chapter is based on information from close to 50 countries, taking into consideration various parameters, such as total number of radiologists, annual salary, number of ultrasound scans performed and increase in efficiency by adoption of these handheld ultrasound imaging devices. 

Chapter 9 features an informed estimate of the global demand for handheld ultrasound imaging devices for the period 2020-2030, taking into account the impact of COVID-19, historical sales of these devices, and annual revenues (generated by sales of these devices) of prominent device manufacturers. 

Chapter 10 presents an insightful market forecast, highlighting the likely growth of handheld ultrasound imaging devices market till the year 2030. We have segmented the market across  [A] application area (cardiac, emergency medicines, gynecological / obstetrics, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, urological, vascular and other application areas), [B] type of transducer array (curved, endocavity, linear, phased and other scanners), [C] type of software (smartphone application and customized software-based scanners), [D] end-users (ambulatory surgical centers, diagnostic imaging centers, hospitals, maternity clinics, specialty clinics and other end-users), and [E] key geographical regions (North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific and rest of the world). In order to account for future uncertainties and to add robustness to our model, we have provided three forecast scenarios, namely conservative, base and optimistic scenarios, representing different tracks of the industry’s growth.

Chapter 11 features an analysis to highlight the product distribution strategies adopted by different end-users, demand and market attractiveness for handheld ultrasound imaging devices across different types of end-users, including diagnostic imaging centers, hospitals, clinics and others.

Chapter 12 highlights the impact of COVID-19 on the overall handheld ultrasound imaging devices market. In addition, it features a brief discussion on the key lessons learnt from big pharma players in 2008 recession.

Chapter 13 is a summary of the overall report. In this chapter, we have provided a list of key takeaways from the report, and expressed our independent opinion related to the research and analysis described in the previous chapters.

Chapter 14 is a collection of interview transcripts of discussions held with various key stakeholders in this market. The chapter provides a brief overview of the companies and details of interviews held with Stefan Maas (Chief Executive Officer, SomaView), Colin Finlayson (Chief Operating Officer, Ballater Medical), Anais Concepcion (Director of Content and Digital Campaigns, EchoNous), and Zhengzheng Zhu (International Business Development, PeakSonic)

Chapter 15 is an appendix, which provides tabulated data and numbers for all the figures provided in the report.

Chapter 16 is an appendix, which contains the list of companies and organizations mentioned in the report.

Chapter 17 is an appendix, which contains the list of suppliers / distributor companies

Table Of Contents

1. PREFACE
1.1. Scope of the Report
1.2. Research Methodology
1.3. Key Questions Answered
1.4. Chapter Outlines

2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3. INTRODUCTION 
3.1. Chapter Overview
3.2. Introduction to Ultrasound Imaging
3.3. Historical Evolution of Ultrasound Imaging
3.4. Challenges with Conventional Ultrasound Imaging Devices

3.5. Introduction to Portable Ultrasound Imaging Devices
3.5.1. Device Classification
3.5.1.1. Cart-based Ultrasound Devices
3.5.1.2. Hand-carried Ultrasound Devices
3.5.1.3. Handheld Ultrasound Devices

3.5.2. Key Application Areas 
3.5.3. Key Advantages and Limitations

3.6. Prevalent Trends Related to Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
3.6.1. Emerging Focus Areas
3.6.2. Key Historical Trends
3.6.3. Geographical Activity

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1. Chapter Overview
4.2. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Overall Market Landscape
4.2.1. Analysis by Status of Development
4.2.2. Analysis by Application Area
4.2.3. Analysis by Weight of Device
4.2.4. Analysis by Type of Transducer Array
4.2.5. Analysis by Transducer Frequency
4.2.6. Analysis by Mode of Imaging
4.2.7. Analysis by Scanning Depth
4.2.8. Analysis by Type of Software
4.2.9. Analysis by Connectivity Provisions
4.2.10. Analysis by Data Management Feature(s)
4.2.11. Analysis by Battery Backup

4.3. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Additional Information
4.3.1. Analysis by Cost of Device
4.4. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Information on Affiliated Technologies
4.5. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: List of Manufacturers
4.5.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
4.5.2. Analysis by Company Size
4.5.3. Analysis by Types of Business Model Used
4.5.4. Analysis by Target Market
4.5.5. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
4.5.6. Leading Manufacturers: Analysis by Number of Products

4.6. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Product Competitiveness Analysis
4.6.1. Assumptions / Key Parameters
4.6.2. Methodology
4.6.3. Product Competitiveness

4.7. Leading Manufacturers: 4D Bubble Analysis based on Application area, Mode of Imaging, Number of Devices and Company Size
4.8. Grid Representation: Analysis by Application Area, Type of Transducer Array and Type of Software
4.9. Heat Map Representation: Analysis by Application Area and Mode of Imaging
4.10. Tree Map Representation: Analysis by Mode of Imaging and Connectivity Provision
4.11. World Map Representation: Regional Activity

5. COMPANY PROFILES
5.1. Chapter Overview
5.2. Butterfly Network
5.2.1. Company Overview
5.2.2. Product Portfolio: Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
5.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

5.3. Clarius Mobile Health
5.3.1. Company Overview
5.3.2. Product Portfolio: Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
5.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

5.4. EchoNous
5.4.1. Company Overview
5.4.2. Product Portfolio: Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
5.4.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

5.5. Fujifilm
5.5.1. Company Overview
5.5.2. Product Portfolio: Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
5.5.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

5.6. GE Healthcare
5.6.1. Company Overview
5.6.2. Product Portfolio: Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
5.6.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

5.7. Philips
5.7.1. Company Overview
5.7.2. Product Portfolio: Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
5.7.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlooks

5.8. WuHan Youkey Bio-Medical Electronics
5.8.1. Company Overview
5.8.2. Product Portfolio: Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
5.8.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

6. BRAND POSITIONING ANALYSIS OF KEY PLAYERS
6.1. Chapter Overview
6.2. Scope and Methodology
6.3. Brand Positioning Matrix: Butterfly Network
6.4. Brand Positioning Matrix: Clarius Mobile Health 
6.5. Brand Positioning Matrix: EchoNous
6.6. Brand Positioning Matrix: Fujifilm
6.7. Brand Positioning Matrix: GE Healthcare
6.8. Brand Positioning Matrix: Philips
6.9. Brand Positioning Matrix: WuHan Youkey Bio-Medical Electronics

7. PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATIONS
7.1. Chapter Overview
7.2. Partnership Models
7.3. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: List of Partnerships and Collaborations
7.3.1. Analysis by Year of Partnership
7.3.2. Analysis by Type of Partnership
7.3.3. Analysis by Year and Type of Partnership
7.3.4. Analysis by Type of Partner
7.3.5. Analysis by Focus Area
7.3.6. Most Active Players: Analysis by Number of Partnerships
7.3.7. Regional Analysis
7.3.8. Intercontinental and Intracontinental Agreements

8. COST SAVING ANALYSIS
8.1. Chapter Overview
8.2. Methodology
8.3. Key Parameters Influencing the Cost of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
8.4. Overall Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices, 2020-2030

8.5. Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Analysis by Geography
8.5.1. Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in North America, 2020-2030
8.5.2. Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Europe, 2020-2030
8.5.3. Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World, 2020-2030

8.6. Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Analysis by Economic Strength
8.6.1. Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in High Income Countries, 2020-2030
8.6.2. Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Upper Middle Income Countries, 2020-2030
8.6.3. Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Lower Middle Income Countries, 2020-2030
8.7. Concluding Remarks: Cost Saving Scenarios

9. DEMAND ANALYSIS
9.1. Chapter Overview
9.2. Methodology
9.3. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Global Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
9.4. Overall Global Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices, 2020-2030
9.5. Global Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Analysis by Key Industry Players
9.6. Global Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Analysis by End-Users

10. MARKET FORECAST
10.1. Chapter Overview
10.2. Forecast Methodology and Key Assumptions

10.3. Overall Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market, 2020-2030
10.3.1. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Application Area
10.3.1.1. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Cardiac Scanning, 2020-2030
10.3.1.2. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Emergency Medicines, 2020-2030
10.3.1.3. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Gynecological / Obstetrics Scanning, 2020-2030
10.3.1.4. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Musculoskeletal Scanning, 2020-2030
10.3.1.5. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Pulmonary Scanning, 2020-2030
10.3.1.6. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Urological Scanning, 2020-2030
10.3.1.7. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Vascular Surgery, 2020-2030
10.3.1.8. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Other Application Areas, 2020-2030

10.3.2. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Type of Transducer Array
10.3.2.1. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Curved Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030
10.3.2.2. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Endocavity Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030
10.3.2.3. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Linear Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030
10.3.2.4. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Phased Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030
10.3.2.5. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Other Scanners, 2020-2030

10.3.3. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Type of Software
10.3.3.1. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Smartphone Application-based Scanners, 2020-2030
10.3.3.2. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Customized Software-based Scanners, 2020-2030

10.3.4. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by End-Users

10.3.5. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Key Geographical Regions
10.3.5.1. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in North America, 2020-2030
10.3.5.2. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Europe, 2020-2030
10.3.5.3. Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World, 2020-2030

10.4. Concluding Remarks

11. DEMAND AND MARKET OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS (END-USER PERSPECTIVE)
11.1. Chapter Overview
11.2. Methodology
11.3. Distribution / Marketing Strategies Adopted by Device Developers

11.4. Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
11.4.1. End-User Demand Analysis: Ambulatory Surgical Centers, 2020-2030
11.4.2. End-User Demand Analysis: Diagnostic Imaging Centers, 2020-2030
11.4.3. End-User Demand Analysis: Hospitals, 2020-2030
11.4.4. End-User Demand Analysis: Maternity Clinics, 2020-2030
11.4.5. End-User Demand Analysis: Specialty Clinics, 2020-2030
11.4.6. End-User Demand Analysis: Other End-Users, 2020-2030

11.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
11.5.1. End-User Market Attractiveness: Ambulatory Surgical Centers, 2020-2030
11.5.2. End-User Market Attractiveness: Diagnostic Imaging Centers, 2020-2030
11.5.3. End-User Market Attractiveness: Hospitals, 2020-2030
11.5.4. End-User Market Attractiveness: Maternity Clinics, 2020-2030
11.5.5. End-User Market Attractiveness: Specialty Clinics, 2020-2030
11.5.6. End-User Market Attractiveness: Other End-Users, 2020-2030

12. CASE STUDY: IMPACT OF CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK
12.1. Chapter Overview
12.2. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Diagnostic Imaging
12.2.1. Impact on Future Market Opportunity for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market
12.3. Recuperative Strategies for Developer Businesses
12.3.1. Strategies for Implementation in the Short / Mid-Term
12.3.2. Strategies for Implementation in the Long-Term 

13. CONCLUSION
13.1. Chapter Overview
13.2. Key Takeaways

14. EXECUTIVE INSIGHTS
14.1. Chapter Overview

14.2. SomaView 
14.2.1. Company Snapshot
14.2.2. Interview Transcript: Stefan Mass, Chief Executive Officer

14.3. Ballater Medical 
14.3.1. Company Snapshot
14.3.2. Interview Transcript: Colin Finlayson, Chief Operating Officer

14.4. EchoNous
14.4.1. Company Snapshot
14.4.2. Interview Transcript: Anais Concepcion, Director of Content and Digital Campaigns

14.5. PeakSonic
14.5.1. Company Snapshot
14.5.2. Interview Transcript: Zhengzheng Zhu, International Business Development

15. APPENDIX 1: TABULATED DATA

16. APPENDIX 2: LIST OF COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

17. APPENDIX 3: LIST OF DISTRIBUTORS / SUPPLIERS 

List Of Figures

Figure 3.1 Historical Evolution of Ultrasound Imaging
Figure 3.2 Key Advantages and Roadblocks for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
Figure 3.3 Emerging Focus Areas: Google News
Figure 3.4 Historical Timeline: Analysis of Google Trends
Figure 3.5 Geographical Activity: Analysis of Google Trends
Figure 4.1 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Status of Development
Figure 4.2 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Approval Year
Figure 4.3 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Application Area
Figure 4.4 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Weight of Device
Figure 4.5 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Type of Transducer Array
Figure 4.6 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Transducer Frequency
Figure 4.7 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Mode of Imaging
Figure 4.8 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Scanning Depth
Figure 4.9 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Type of Software
Figure 4.10 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Connectivity Provisions
Figure 4.11 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Type of Software and Connectivity Provisions
Figure 4.12 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Data Management Feature
Figure 4.13 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Battery Backup
Figure 4.14 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Cost of Device
Figure 4.15 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Year of Establishment
Figure 4.16 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Company Size
Figure 4.17 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Business Model Used
Figure 4.18 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Target Market
Figure 4.19 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Location of Headquarters
Figure 4.20 Leading Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Number of Devices
Figure 4.21 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Product Competitiveness Analysis
Figure 4.22 Leading Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: 4D Bubble Analysis based on Application Area, Mode of Imaging, Number of Devices and Company Size
Figure 4.23 Grid Representation: Distribution by Application Area, Type of Transducer Array and Type of Software
Figure 4.24 Heat Map Representation: Distribution by Application Area and Mode of Imaging
Figure 4.25 Tree Map Representation: Distribution by Mode of Imaging and Connectivity Provision
Figure 4.26 World Map Representation: Regional Activity
Figure 6.1 Brand Positioning Analysis of Key Industry Players: Competitive Advantage
Figure 6.2 Brand Positioning Analysis of Key Industry Players: Reasons to Believe
Figure 6.3 Butterfly Network: Brand Positioning Matrix
Figure 6.4 Clarius Mobile Health: Brand Positioning Matrix
Figure 6.5 EchoNous: Brand Positioning Matrix
Figure 6.6 Fujifilm: Brand Positioning Matrix
Figure 6.7 GE Healthcare: Brand Positioning Matrix
Figure 6.8 Philips: Brand Positioning Matrix
Figure 6.9 WuHan Youkey Bio-Medical Electronicss: Brand Positioning Matrix
Figure 7.1 Partnerships and Collaborations: Cumulative Year-Wise Trend, 2010-May 2020
Figure 7.2 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Partnership
Figure 7.3 Partnerships and Collaborations: Year-Wise Trend by Type of Partnership
Figure 7.4 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Partner
Figure 7.5 Partnerships and Collaborations: Year-Wise Trend by Type of Partner
Figure 7.6 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Partner and Partnership Model
Figure 7.7 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Company Size and Type of Partner
Figure 7.8 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Focus Area
Figure 7.9 Partnerships and Collaborations: Year-Wise Trend by Focus Area
Figure 7.10 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Company Size and Focus Area
Figure 7.11 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Agreement and Focus Area
Figure 7.12 Most Active Players: Distribution by Number of Partnerships
Figure 7.13 Partnerships and Collaborations: Geographical Distribution
Figure 7.14 Partnerships and Collaborations: Regional Distribution
Figure 7.15 Partnerships and Collaborations: Intercontinental and Intracontinental Agreements
Figure 8.1 Overall Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Growth Scenarios
Figure 8.2 Comparison of Key Parameters Influencing the Cost of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
Figure 8.3 Overall Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 8.4 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in North America, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 8.5 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Europe, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 8.6 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 8.7 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in High Income Countries, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 8.8 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Upper Middle Income Countries, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 8.9 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Lower Middle Income Countries, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 8.10 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices, Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios, 2020, 2025 and 2030 (USD Billion)
Figure 9.1 Overall Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices, 2020-2030 (Number of Units)
Figure 9.2 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in 2020: Distribution by Industry Players
Figure 9.3 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by End-Users, 2020 and 2030
Figure 10.1 Overall Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.2 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Application Area, 2020 and 2030
Figure 10.3 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Cardiac Scanning, 2020- 2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.4 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Emergency Medicines, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.5 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Gynecological / ObstetricsScanning, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.6 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Musculoskeletal Scanning,2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.7 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Pulmonary Scanning, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.8 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Urological Scanning, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.9 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Vascular Surgery, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.10 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Other Application Areas, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.11 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Type of Transducer Array, 2020 and 2030
Figure 10.12 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Curved Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.13 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Endocavity Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.14 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Linear Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.15 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Phased Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.16 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Other Scanners, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.17 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Type of Software, 2020 and 2030
Figure 10.18 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Smartphone Application-based Scanners, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.19 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Customized Software-based Scanners, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.20 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by End-Users, 2020 and 2030
Figure 10.21 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Key Geographical Regions, 2020 and 2030
Figure 10.22 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in North America, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.23 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Europe, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.24 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 10.25 Overall Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market, 2020, 2025 and 2030,Base, Optimistic and Conservative Scenario (USD Million)
Figure 11.1 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Ambulatory SurgicalCenters, 2020-2030 (Number of Units)
Figure 11.2 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Diagnostic ImagingCenters, 2020-2030 (Number of Units)
Figure 11.3 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Hospitals, 2020-2030 (Number of Units)
Figure 11.4 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Maternity Centers, 2020-2030 (Number of Units)
Figure 11.5 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Specialty Clinics, 2020- 2030 (Number of Units)
Figure 11.6 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices for Other End-Users, 2020- 2030 (Number of Units)
Figure 11.7 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Ambulatory Surgical Centers, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 11.10 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Diagnostic Imaging Centers, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 11.11 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Hospitals, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 11.12 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Maternity Centers, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 11.13 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Specialty Clinics, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 11.14 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Other End-Users, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Figure 12.1 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market, 2020-2030: COVID Impact Scenario (USD Million) 

List Of Tables

Table 4.1 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Information on Status of Development, Application Area, Weight and Dimensions of Device
Table 4.2 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Information on Type of Transducer Array, Transducer Frequency, Mode of Imaging, Scanning Depth, and Field of  View
Table 4.3 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Information on Type of Software, Connectivity Provisions, Data Management Feature(s) and Battery Backup
Table 4.4 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Additional Details
Table 4.5 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Information on Technology Platforms
Table 4.6 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: List of Manufacturers
Table 5.1 List of Companies Profiled
Table 5.2 Butterfly Network: Company Overview
Table 5.3 Key Characteristics of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
Table 5.4 Butterfly Network: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
Table 5.5 Clarius Mobile Health: Company Overview
Table 5.6 Key Characteristics of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
Table 5.7 Clarius Mobile Health: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
Table 5.8 EchoNous: Company Overview
Table 5.9 Key Characteristics of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
Table 5.10 EchoNous: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
Table 5.11 Fujifilm: Company Overview
Table 5.12 Key Characteristics of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
Table 5.13 Fujifilm: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
Table 5.14 GE Healthcare: Company Overview
Table 5.15 Key Characteristics of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
Table 5.16 GE Healthcare: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
Table 5.17 Philips: Company Overview
Table 5.18 Key Characteristics of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
Table 5.19 Philips: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
Table 5.20 WuHan Youkey Bio-Medical Electronics: Company Overview
Table 5.21 Key Characteristics of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices
Table 5.22 WuHan Youkey Bio-Medical Electronics: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
Table 7.1 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: List of Partnerships and Collaborations, till May 2020
Table 8.1 Cost Saving Analysis: Information on Number of Radiologists in Various Countries
Table 8.2 Cost Saving Analysis: Information on Yearly Count of Ultrasound Scans across Different Geographical Regions, 2020 (Million Scans)
Table 9.1 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Information on Annual Revenues and Prices of Proprietary Devices
Table 10.1 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Information on Device Price across Different Global Regions
Table 11.1 Key Distribution / Marketing Strategies: Harvey Ball Analysis by Ease of Implementation, Value Addition and Current Adoption
Table 13.1 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Summary of the Competitive Insights
Table 14.1 SomaView: Company Snapshot
Table 14.2 Ballater Medical: Company Snapshot
Table 14.3 EchoNous: Company Snapshot
Table 14.4 PeakSonic: Company Snapshot
Table 15.1 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Status of Development
Table 15.2 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Approval Year
Table 15.3 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Application Area
Table 15.4 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Weight of Device
Table 15.5 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Type of Transducer Array
Table 15.6 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Transducer Frequency
Table 15.7 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Mode of Imaging
Table 15.8 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Scanning Depth
Table 15.9 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Type of Software
Table 15.10 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Connectivity Provisions
Table 15.11 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Type of Software and Connectivity Provisions 
Table 15.12 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Data Management Feature
Table 15.13 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Battery Backup
Table 15.14 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Cost of Device
Table 15.15 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Year of Establishment
Table 15.16 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Company Size
Table 15.17 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Business Model Used
Table 15.18 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Target Market
Table 15.19 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Location of Headquarters
Table 15.20 Leading Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: Distribution by Number of Devices
Table 15.21 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Product Competitiveness Analysis
Table 15.22 Leading Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Device Manufacturers: 4D Bubble Analysis based on Application Area, Mode of Imaging, Number of Devices and Company Size
Table 15.23 Grid Representation: Distribution by Application Area, Type of Transducer Array and Type of Software
Table 15.24 Heat Map Representation: Distribution by Application Area and Mode of Imaging
Table 15.25 Tree Map Representation: Distribution by Mode of Imaging and Connectivity Provision
Table 15.26 Partnerships and Collaborations: Cumulative Year-Wise Trend, 2010-May 2020
Table 15.27 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Partnership
Table 15.28 Partnerships and Collaborations: Year-Wise Trend by Type of Partnership
Table 15.29 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Partner
Table 15.30 Partnerships and Collaborations: Year-Wise Trend by Type of Partner
Table 15.31 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Partner and Partnership Model
Table 15.32 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Company Size and Type of Partner
Table 15.33 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Focus Area
Table 15.34 Partnerships and Collaborations: Year-Wise Trend by Focus Area
Table 15.35 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Company Size and Focus Area
Table 15.36 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Agreement and Focus Area
Table 15.37 Most Active Players: Distribution by Number of Partnerships
Table 15.38 Partnerships and Collaborations: Geographical Distribution
Table 15.39 Partnerships and Collaborations: Regional Distribution
Table 15.40 Partnerships and Collaborations: Intercontinental and Intracontinental Agreements
Table 15.41 Overall Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices, 2020- 2030 (USD Million)
Table 15.42 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in North America, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Table 15.43 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Europe, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Table 15.44 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Table 15.45 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in High Income Countries, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Table 15.46 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Upper Middle  Income Countries, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Table 15.47 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Lower Middle  Income Countries, 2020-2030 (USD Million)
Table 15.48 Cost Saving Potential of Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices, Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios, 2020, 2025 and 2030 (USD 
Table 15.49 Overall Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices, 2020-2030 (Number of Units)
Table 15.50 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by Key Industry Players, 2020 and 2030
Table 15.51 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices: Distribution by End-Users, 2020 and 2030
Table 15.52 Overall Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.53 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Application Area, 2020 and 2030
Table 15.54 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Cardiac Scanning, 2020- 2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.55 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Emergency Medicines, 2020- 2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.56 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Gynecological / Obstetrics Scanning, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.57 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Musculoskeletal Scanning, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.58 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Pulmonary Scanning, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.59 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Urological Scanning, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.60 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Vascular Surgery, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.61 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Other Application Areas, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.62 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Type of Transducer Array, 2020 and 2030
Table 15.63 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Curved Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.64 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Endocavity Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.65 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Linear Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.66 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Phased Array-based Scanners, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.67 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Other Scanners, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.68 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Type of Software, 2020 and 2030
Table 15.69 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Smartphone Application- based Scanners, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.70 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Customized Software-based Scanners, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.71 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by End-Users, 2020 and 2030
Table 15.72 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market: Distribution by Key Geographical Regions, 2020 and 2030
Table 15.73 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in North America, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.74 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Europe, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.75 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.76 Overall Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market, 2020, 2025 and 2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.77 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Ambulatory Surgical Centers, 2020-2030 (Number of Units)
Table 15.78 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Diagnostic Imaging Centers, 2020-2030 (Number of Units)
Table 15.79 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Hospitals, 2020-2030 (Number of Units)
Table 15.80 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Maternity Centers, 2020-2030 (Number of Units)
Table 15.81 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices in Specialty Clinics, 2020- 2030 (Number of Units)
Table 15.82 Demand for Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices for Other End-Users, 2020- 2030 (Number of Units)
Table 15.83 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Ambulatory Surgical Centers, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.84 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Diagnostic Imaging Centers, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.85 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Hospitals, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.86 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Maternity Centers, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.87 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market in Specialty Clinics, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 15.88 Handheld Ultrasound Imaging Devices Market for Other End-Users, 2020-2030: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
Table 17.1 Handheld Ultrasound Scanning Devices: List of Distributors / Suppliers

Listed Companies

The following companies and organizations have been mentioned in the report. 

  1. Affidea
  2. Aga Khan University Hospital
  3. Agilent Technologies
  4. Aidmax Medical
  5. Alb Fils Kliniken dual-site hospital
  6. Allen Institute of Artificial Intelligence
  7. American International Medical University
  8. Analogic
  9. Anhui Beixiang Imp&Exp Trade
  10. Arthrex
  11. Australian Centre for Visual Technologies
  12. Ballater Medical
  13. Ballater Medical
  14. Beijing Konted Medical Technology
  15. BenQ Medical
  16. Biim Ultrasound
  17. BK Medical
  18. Blue Willow Systems
  19. Boston Scientific
  20. breastIT 
  21. Butterfly Network
  22. Caresono Technology
  23. Carestream Health
  24. CelticSMR
  25. Chengdu Stork Healthcare
  26. CHISON Medical Technologies
  27. CJ Medical
  28. CJ Medical
  29. Clarius Mobile Health
  30. Daiichi Sankyo
  31. DiA Imaging Analysis
  32. EchoNous
  33. Emagine Solutions Technology
  34. Erasmus University Medical Center
  35. Esaote
  36. Exo Imaging
  37. Fosun Pharmaceutical
  38. Fujifilm
  39. Fujitsu Australia
  40. GE Healthcare
  41. General Hospital Korea
  42. Guangzhou Allfine Medlab
  43. Guangzhou ICEN Technology
  44. Guangzhou Labon Medical Equipment
  45. Guangzhou Medsinglong Medical Equipment
  46. Guangzhou ProCare Medical Equipment
  47. Guangzhou Sonostar Technologies
  48. Guangzhou Top Medical Equipment
  49. Guanzhou Yueshen Medical Equipment
  50. Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
  51. Healcerion
  52. Healson Technology
  53. Hefei MT Medical
  54. Hologic
  55. Humana
  56. Hunan Runkun Pharmaceutical
  57. Infinite Leap
  58. Inspira Health
  59. Intelligent Ultrasound
  60. Interson Medical Instruments
  61. Intimex
  62. JinKang Medical
  63. KindredBio
  64. Kitware
  65. KKR
  66. Klinikum Stuttgart
  67. Kyoto University
  68. Mater Private Hospital
  69. Maya Medical Equipment
  70. Medical Devices and Testing
  71. Meditech Equipment
  72. Medumo
  73. Mianyang Meike Electronic Equipment
  74. MicroElastic Ultrasound Systems
  75. Mindray Medical
  76. Ministry of Health, Murcia
  77. München Klinik
  78. Nantong Yikun Medical Apparatus
  79. NightBalance
  80. NRW.BANK
  81. NVIDIA
  82. Oxford Enhanced Medical
  83. Paige
  84. Paracelsus Clinics
  85. Partners HealthCare
  86. PeakSonic
  87. Philips
  88. Point-of-care Ultrasound in Resource-limited Environments
  89. PoketSonics
  90. Providian Medical
  91. Qingdao Harmony International Trade
  92. Raecho International
  93. Reacts - Innovative Imaging Technologies
  94. Regional Medical Center
  95. Renew Group
  96. RIVANNA
  97. Samsung
  98. Sana Kliniken Leipziger Land Clinic for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine
  99. Savvik Buying Group
  100. Shanghai Jaqi International Trade
  101. Shenzhen Better Instrument
  102. Shenzhen City Teveik Technology
  103. Shenzhen Ninaisi Technology
  104. Shenzhen Yuvnice Technology
  105. Siemens Healthineers
  106. Simeks Tibbi Sistemler
  107. Somax Systems
  108. Sonoscanner
  109. SonoSim
  110. Sound Technology
  111. State (Beijing) Medical Technology
  112. Sunbright Industrial
  113. TECHNOPATH
  114. The American Nurses Foundation
  115. Toshiba
  116. Uganda Cancer Institute
  117. UltraSee
  118. Ultrasonix Medical Corporation
  119. Ultrasound Podcast
  120. United Nations Population Fund 
  121. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  122. University of Alberta
  123. University of Missouri System
  124. Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  125. Vave Health
  126. VieCuri Medical Center
  127. VINNO
  128. WiFiUltras
  129. Wuhan Darppon Medical Technology
  130. WuHan Youkey Bio-Medical Electronics
  131. XENOMED
  132. Xhale Assurance
  133. Xian Yima Optoelec
  134. Yor Labs
  135. Zaans Medical Center
  136. Ziteo Medical

Request Customization

Please select a suitable option for customization in the report

PRICING DETAILS

USD 4,899

This license grants the right of use of the purchased report to a single recipient only (normally the person who buys the report). You may access the material on your computer, as and when required, for your own personal use. You may also print read more

This license grants the right of use of the purchased report by the employees of a business unit at a particular site / office location. The report may be accessed on the computer of any employee within the business unit. You may also print multiple read more

This license entitles the buyer of the report to share, distribute the report (either full or in part) with other employees of the same firm / enterprise. The report may be accessed by any employee of the enterprise and there is no limit on the read more

Discounts available for multiple report purchases
sales@rootsanalysis.com