Published: February 2024
Rare diseases, constituting a significant health challenge, impact around 30 million individuals in the European Union (EU) and US, each. Within this spectrum, there are more than 1000 rare skin diseases, which are often genetically rooted. Recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as conditions affecting fewer than 65 per 100,000 people, these rare disorders underscore a pressing demand for advanced treatments that address the root causes rather than merely alleviating symptoms. Bridging this gap remains crucial to enhance the quality of life for those grappling with these less prevalent yet profound health issues. In this article on epidermolysis bullosa treatment, we will take a closer look at the fundamentals of Epidermolysis Bullosa, a rare skin genetic disorder, and explore the landscape of both approved and clinical therapies.
Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic disorder causing various degrees of skin and mucous membrane fragility. It results from genetic mutations disrupting any one of the essential 16 skin proteins, making the skin prone to painful blisters triggered by even minor friction. Being an inherited disorder, the symptoms usually appear at birth as the proteins essential for skin integrity are absent, reduced, or abnormal. These blisters can occur both externally and internally. In mild cases, blistering may primarily affect the hands, feet, knees, and elbows. However, severe cases often involve widespread blistering and wound formation, leading to vision loss, loss or fusion of toe and fingers nails, difficulty swallowing, breathing problems and in some cases organ failure and aggressive squamous cell carcinoma. Children living with EB are often known as The Butterfly Children because their skin is as sensitive as the butterfly wings.
Depending on the layer of skin in which the formation of blisters occurs, EB is classified into four major types which have been briefly described in the table below:
| Type of EB | Skin Layer Involved | Gene(s) Involved | Type of Inheritance |
Number of Clinical Subtypes |
| EB Simplex (EBS) | Epidermis | KRT5 KRT14 PLE KLHL24 DST EXPH5 CD151 |
Mostly dominant but can be recessive | ~14 |
| Dystrophic EB (DEB) | Dermis Below the Basement Membrane | COL7A1 | Recessive or dominant | ~11 |
| Junctional EB (JEB) | Basement Membrane |
LAMA3 |
Recessive | ~8 |
| Kindler Syndrome | Mixed Skin Cleavage Pattern | FERMT1 | Recessive | -- |
Epidermolysis bullosa is caused by an inherited gene. The disease gene can be inherited from one parent who has the disease (autosomal dominant inheritance) or from both parents (autosomal recessive inheritance). The various inheritance patterns have been summarized in the image below. Notably, Dystrophic EB, which has been mentioned in the table above, is divided into two major types depending on the inheritance pattern: recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) and dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DDEB).

EB poses a significant global health care challenge, with treatment costs in the US reaching up to USD 300,000 per year for severely affected patients. Monthly wound care supplies alone are estimated at over USD 10,000. The urgency is emphasized by the short life expectancy, ranging from early infancy to around age 30. Traditional approaches to EB management are focused on symptom relief through wound care, pain management, and infection prevention, using various medications, such as antihistamines, analgesics and corticosteroids. Some companies are developing advanced wound care dressings for epidermolysis bullosa wounds. Such as Mepitel from Molnlycke Health Care, which is a non-adherent silicone dressing used in EB wounds. However, these approaches do not address the root genetic causes of EB, creating a need for innovative therapies. The industry is currently exploring pathogenesis-directed approaches, leading to the evaluation of gene therapies (gene replacement, gene editing, RNA-based therapy, natural gene therapy), cell-based therapies (fibroblasts, bone marrow transplantation, mesenchymal stromal cells, induced pluripotential stem cells), recombinant protein therapies, and small molecule and drug repurposing approaches. Some of these approaches have been successful and approved, while others are undergoing clinical trials, offering promising epidermolysis bullosa treatment avenues.
This article highlights the Approved Drugs, Business Outlook and Clinical Trial Landscape within the Epidermolysis Bullosa Treatment Market.
Until recently, there were no therapies approved specifically for Epidermolysis Bullosa treatment. However, approvals of EB therapies commenced across various regions in 2022. Details on the various approved drugs has been mentioned below:
Subsidiary of
Acquired by
1. Geography: US
2. Geography: Europe and UK

1. Geography: US
2. Geography: Europe
3. Geography: Japan
The section below highlights various trends that are shaping up the trajectory of epidermolysis bullosa treatment and market dynamics.
Epidermolysis bullosa, impacting 1 in 20,000 births globally with around 500,000 affected individuals worldwide, is unequivocally a rare disease. With less than 200,000 patients in the US, fewer than 5 patients per 10,000 inhabitants in the European Union and below 50,000 patients in Japan, the rarity of this disease creates challenges in recruiting participants for clinical trials. This obstacle hinders the demonstration of drug efficacy and safety. Recognizing this, governments across the globe provide incentives to encourage the development of drugs for rare disorders. For instance, the FDA’s Orphan Drug Act provides vital incentives, including tax credits (50% off the clinical drug testing cost awarded upon approval), 7 years of market exclusivity, and waiver of NDA / BLA application fee for companies developing drugs for patients suffering from rare disorders in the US. In addition, it awards a Priority Review Voucher (PRV) to players developing drugs for rare indications. The PRV can either be sold to another drug sponsor or can be redeemed later to receive priority review from FDA with a targeted review time of 6 months, rather than the 10-month standard review, for a selected drug application. The potential for additional revenue from either selling the PRV or marketing a drug about 4 months sooner could provide an incentive for drug sponsors to develop drugs for uncommon medical conditions. Notably, in August 2023, Krystal Biotech's sale of a PRV for USD 100 Million underscored the significance of this incentive.
Since therapies targeting rare disorders serve smaller patient populations, their cost of development is shared by fewer patients. As a result, the drug developers generally price them high to ensure profitability. Further, novel modalities, specifically gene therapies, incur relatively higher expenses owing to the complexity of producing, handling, and controlling viral vectors. It is interesting to note that Krystal Biotech has set the annual cost of Vyjuvek, a gene therapy, at USD 630,500 per patient, assuming an average usage of 26 vials per year priced at USD 24,250 each. In order to drive the adoption of this expensive therapy, Krystal is implementing an innovative payment model, offering commercial payer clients a cap of USD 900,000 annually per patient. This volume based incentivization is likely to be indirectly beneficial for patients requiring a larger quantity of vials. In contrast to gene therapies, the list price for Filsuvez, a topical small molecule drug, is only around USD 350 per 23.4g in the UK. To drive adoption, the company offers a discounted access scheme for the National Health Service (NHS), although the specific discount remains confidential according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
Governments globally are crucially involved in facilitating reimbursement for life-saving medications, ensuring not only patient access to essential treatments but also enabling companies to market their high-priced drugs to those who may face affordability challenges. For instance, the US government is actively backing reimbursement of Vyjuvek for dystrophic EB patients. Medicaid, designed for low-income individuals, ensures Vyjuvek is attainable at a discounted rate of USD 485,000. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented a permanent J-code (J3401) on January 1, 2024, simplifying billing and reimbursement processes to foster efficient and accurate support for patients and rare drug development companies alike.
Bringing gene therapy to outpatient care is a game-changer in healthcare, giving patients the chance for personalized treatment outside the hospital. Currently, Vyjuvek’s administration requires a healthcare provider who applies the gel to the open wounds and wraps the area with a hydrophobic dressing. This is because the administration process involves an intricate syringe filling step, although the therapy is applied in a droplet pattern without penetrating the skin. In the future, there is a possibility that administration of Vyjuvek would be done in an outpatient setting as more patients become comfortable with self-administering the product. The potential self-application of this epidermolysis bullosa treatment, which requires frequent administration, would translate to substantial time and cost savings for the patient, thereby driving adoption.
There are approximately over 20 companies which are evaluating therapies for epidermolysis bullosa across various stages of development. The table below highlights some notable players with pipeline drugs undergoing advanced-phase trials.
| Company | YoE | HQ | Employee Count | Drug | POD | NCT |
| Abeona Therapeutics | 2015 | ![]() |
51-200 |
EB-101/ |
Phase III | NCT05725018 |
| Castle Creek Biosciences | 2020 | ![]() |
11-50 | FCX-007/D-Fi/ dabocemagene autoficel |
Phase III | NCT04213261 |
| RHEACELL | 2003 | ![]() |
51-200 | allo-APZ2-OTS injection/ allogeneic ABCB5-positive dermal mesenchymal stromal cells |
Phase III | NCT05838092 |
| Holostem | 2008 | ![]() |
11-50 | Epidermal stem cells transduced with a LAMB3-gamma retroviral vector |
Phase II/III | NCT05111600 |
In addition to the aforementioned epidermolysis bullosa treatment, several other drugs are being evaluated in phase II trials. An inexhaustive list of such drugs, along with their developer names, has been presented below:
Developing drugs for rare disorders is inherently challenging due to limited patient populations, a lack of prior research, regulatory complexities, economic viability concerns, and the scientific intricacies involved. Consequently, companies invest substantial resources in research, development and clinical trials. Unfortunately, discontinuation in advanced stages, often due to unforeseen challenges or insufficient efficacy, can result in substantial losses for the companies involved. It is worth highlighting that RGN-137 by Regenrx / Lenus Therapeutics was discontinued after phase II trial study and SD-101 cream by Scioderm was discontinued after phase III clinical investigation.
At Roots Analysis, we can provide in-depth research and analysis on the business outlook within the epidermolysis bullosa treatment market.
In order to analyze the pipeline activity within this domain in detail, we downloaded the completed and ongoing interventional clinical trials from clinicaltrials.gov. 15 terminated and withdrawn trials were removed from the list. Currently, 68 clinical trials are active for epidermolysis bullosa treatment. The count of trials does not correspond to the number of drugs, as a single drug may have been evaluated across different phases of a trial. The image below presents insights on the clinical trials that have been conducted / are being conducted for epidermolysis bullosa treatment:

We have briefly summarized some insights related to the clinical landscape for epidermolysis bullosa treatment below.
As of now, a total of 1,673 patients have been enrolled or are currently undergoing recruitment in interventional trials for EB. Apart from the challenge of a limited patient pool, various factors may hinder EB patients' participation in clinical trials, including study duration, competition with ongoing trials, exclusion criteria, travel costs, additional clinical tests, family commitments, and misconceptions about cell and gene therapies. Facilitating patient recruitment can be achieved through collaboration with clinical-network partners, with organizations like EB Client serving as mediators, and entities such as DEBRA International actively contributing to the development of long-term clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for EB. Notably, Amryt Pharma’s phase III study of Oleogel-S10, completed in 2022, achieved the highest patient enrollment to date, with 223 participants. More than 40% of the trials have enrolled less than 10 EB patients, highlighting the need for a better patient recruitment process to evaluate the therapies for this rare disorder.
Drug repurposing involves discovering new applications for existing treatments, offering a quicker and more cost-effective way to expand treatment options for individuals with EB compared to developing entirely new treatments. Demonstrating the effectiveness of these repurposed drugs necessitates well-designed clinical trials before they can be officially licensed for use in the EB patient population. Several non-industry entities are actively engaged in conducting such clinical trials. For example, the University of Southern California is investigating the antibiotic Gentamicin, which is already approved for treating various bacterial infections such as meningitis, blood infections, and serious urinary tract infections. Additionally, Stanford University is exploring the potential of Sirolimus, a drug approved for lymphangioleiomyomatosis, and Northwestern University is evaluating Dupilumab, an approved treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. These initiatives signify collaborative efforts beyond the pharmaceutical industry to repurpose existing drugs for the benefit of individuals with EB.
Demonstrating safety and efficacy in both Europe and the USA can provide a competitive advantage over drugs that have only been tested in one region. It may also position the company as a global player in the rare disease treatment space. Currently, over 95% of trials are being conducted in a single region, such as the US or Europe, since players want to test the waters before expanding globally. However, some pioneers are venturing beyond. Notably, RHEACELL (NCT03529877) and Amryt Research (NCT03068780) are actively conducting clinical trials in both North America and Europe, showcasing a strategic move toward broader geographical reach.
In November 2023, Healiva and C4U Corporation joined forces to develop CRISPR-Cas3-based therapeutic solutions for Epidermolysis Bullosa. C4U Corporation, a Japanese biotech company, specializes in gene therapies for rare diseases, utilizing its CRISPR-Cas3 gene editing platform, which has been validated in vitro and in vivo. Healiva's proprietary technology platform focuses on acute and chronic wound therapies, employing an affordable end-to-end approach that combines cell therapies, autologous (EpiDex®), and allogeneic cell therapy for personalized and precision medicine in wound care. The future of Epidermolysis Bullosa treatment holds great promise with ongoing advancements in gene editing and other innovative therapeutic approaches anticipated to transform the landscape of care for individuals affected by this condition.
At Roots Analysis, we can provide in-depth analysis on active, ongoing, completed and discontinued clinical trials for epidermolysis bullosa treatment. For personalized assistance in identifying the most relevant solutions based on your specific criteria, please don't hesitate to reach out to us at sales@rootsanalysis.com.
Sources
Source 1: https://www.drugs.com/condition/dystrophic-epidermolysis-bullosa.html
Source 2: https://www.debra.org/about-eb/approved-treatments-eb
Source 3: https://clinicaltrials.gov/
Source 4: https://epidermolysisbullosanews.com/news/new-partners-using-technology-develop-eb-gene-editing-therapy/
Source 5: https://www.cgtlive.com/view/bvec-vyjuvek-gene-therapy-approved-dystrophic-epidermolysis-bullosa
Source 6: https://www.debra.org/